From Magical Dates to Mayan Doomsday

Guess everyone survived Wednesday last week, eh? Went to all the wedding parties, visited all the newborn babies, signing all the important papers? Or ran your usual errands, like going to Pilates class and visiting your dermatologist, as I did?

Based on its sequence 12th December of 2012, or 12/12/12, was supposedly the last symmetrical date we’d ever see in our lifetime. First of all, there’s no 13th month. Secondly, none of us is supposedly blessed with such longevity to live through 12th December of 2112– unless the much-taunted zombie apocalypse really had some grounds (in which, “Eeeeek!”)

There are many people who find genuine delight in symmetrical numbers. Dad never missed the 1:11, 5:55 or 12:12 on the car’s dashboard clock, pointing at it gleefully while driving. I know enough people who tweet the strike of such hours, usually marked with a personal note or emoticon. Phone providers or realtors have long dealt with customers wanting to own particular digits for their personal properties.

Many people take the fancy to the next level and use those dates and hours to sign business deals, relocate, tie knots, or deliver baby—auspicious, easy to remember, or visually appealing are cited for reasons (as the Indonesians call it, “tanggal cantik” or “nomer cantik”). One of the most tweeted news on 12/12/12 was about the Alabama-based Kiam Moriya who turned 12 at precisely 12:12 pm that day– a particular birthday he had known and waited for with excitement since he was old enough to remember (it should be noted that he was born naturally, when his mom’s water broke 7 weeks too early). And despite criticisms or mockeries (I’ve heard some calling the 12/12/12 newlyweds as ‘freaks’ or parents bearing babies that day as ‘dominatrix’) I think everyone reserves the rights to schedule their private milestones.

Back to apocalypse. I’m not into the zombie euphoria, maybe because, umm, the zombies have zero appeal on this very-visual me. The hotly-debated apocalypse these days are none other than the one supposedly prophesied by the Mayan tribe, who roamed Mesoamerica, from modern Mexico to northern Costa Rica, a few thousand years ago. When the clock struck on midnight before last Thursday rolled in some incredibly misinformed people grunted that the Mayans had it wrong. Let me take this opportunity to clear up once again that, helloooo, the Mayans never said 12th of December. They said the 21st (or, considering the numerical gap between their almanac and the Gregorian calendar we use nowadays, the 23rd). Whoever got it wrong about the 12th and everyone who chose to accept it without Googling were clearly Net-illiterates, as far as I’m concerned.

Half of the world has moved into the 22nd now, and many people have either gone to celebrate or curse the Mayans– but, let’s ponder for a bit, did the Mayans REALLY mean doomsday?

The fact is, modern astronomy can calculate, calibrate and project planet movements sufficient enough to forecast a fatal collision. I trust some super genius people somewhere actually know how to somehow prevent or manage if such collision were ever in horizon– even if not in the patriotic style Ben Affleck and Bruce Willis taming a meteor with Steven Tyler wailing in the background.

Personally, I believe such brilliant efforts may not guarantee no doomsdays when The Divinity eventually decides to call us home at one swift go.

But, in the name of scientific approach, as any modern girl should do, I went on some information and knowledge search. A couple of archaeology or astronomy journals have discussed the issue at length, and here’s the summary of my learning.

First, the 21st of 23rd of this month coincides with the end of a Long Count Mayan cycle. There was never a mention that at the end of the cycle an apocalypse would ensue.

Second, the current Mayan almanac runs on about 5000-year period yet, interestingly enough, when this almanac was made a big part of it had already passed. Using our own calendar as example, though it starts on January 1st the calendar itself is made sometimes in March. There are no findings to intelligently explain why the Mayans decided to pick something in the past as the beginning of this cycle (which, as an archaeologist wryly remarked, there’s probably also no intelligent reason on the way they ended the cycle).

Third, the original almanac was engraved in Mayan orthography on supposedly humongous stone slabs. Now here’s me wryly asking, isn’t it entirely possible that the Mayans just ran out of stones to continue engraving the almanac on? I mean, it’s not like they had fancy forklifts and cool cranes those days.

As often the case, the most eloquent interpretation comes from the so-called New Age camp. The astrological Age of Aquarius, which lasts for 2,150 years in average, supposedly has just started or about to start soon depending on calculation methods. Many in this camp read it as the Mayans referring to the dawning of Aquarian Age. The world-renowned Kundalini master Yogi Bhajan pointed to November 20th of last year (!) as the full transition timing of Aquarian Age.

But hey, at the end of the day, again, I personally believe only The Divinity knows the actual end of days. Even if you’re reading this column all alive, we still have until the 23rd to find out if the Mayans got it right all along. In which case, let’s all turn off our gadgets, go out, and do something spectacular.

Natch.

Posted in Art & Culture, City Life, Society | Leave a comment

Meddling Much in Middle Class: The Ivory Towers’ New Pastime

Enjoying your weekend? Either savoring Sunday brunch, sweating at gym, catching the latest flick and frocks or, hopefully, spending time outside malls with your beloveds, I wish you a good time. One does need rest after toiling away at work for 5-6 days, often into the wee hours, in addition to braving the gruesome urban traffic. Especially if one has paid due taxes and cast votes at elections, what’s there to stop enjoying the hard-earned fruits of one’s hard work, eh?
 
Yet, lo and behold, to some ultra-vigilant eyes in the country’s ivory towers, namely leading media channels and academics, we’re all just a bunch of image-chasing, product-guzzling, service-demanding, mad middle class, with no appetite left for something as glorious as risks and, um, revolution. Apparently Karl Marx named us “the parasites of capitalism”. A certain politician even lamented via Twitter that we’re “seasonal humanists”, which made me feel reduced to a bowl of exotic tropical fruits.
 
I won’t dwell on Karl Marx because, after all, he also coined the term lumpenproletariat, a.k.a. the rotten working class. I suspect the guy actually just despised the entire human race.
 
Let’s talk about this oft-reviled middle class. Who actually makes up the middle class? Debates have been raging longer than I have lived, but the recent general consensus for Asia Pacific by World Bank defines it as anyone with daily spending expenditure of USD 2-20.
 
That wide grouping alone is problematic. For example, an entry-level clerk may spend around USD 5 for daily commute and lunch, while a senior manager forks over USD 15 for the same expenses. The monthly income gap between them is easily about USD 1,000, which also will factor differently into their saving, investing, or total spending patterns, yet both are defined as ‘middle class’. Just as teachers and pupils’ parents, nurses and doctors, factory foremen and engineers, paralegals and lawyers, reporters and editors, small and medium entrepreneurs, are all middle class mass.
 
While we leave experts to iron out a clear definition, let’s try to look at what this so-called middle class can do. A quick look at prominent economic studies through the years show that middle class has proven to be contributing to accelerate a country’s growth. They account for around 18% of Indonesia population by 2010, and if you look at the country’s steady growth in recent years, it’s hard to deny the (in)-direct contribution of our middle class.
 
Does middle class consume more, of products and services, as their income rises? Sure. Their consumption growth tends to be higher than their income growth. Yet it’s not specific for Indonesia. Quick examples in the region; China and India. After being deprived from the outside world for decades, Chinese middle class now roams the globe, snapping up the latest, priciest gems and gadgets they can find that they, along with the rest of Asia that’s largely spared from the global credit crunch, practically rescued the international luxury business in the past 3 years. Indian new money may not be into bulk-buying Vuitton handbags, but do check the latest names listed over Dubai’s tony neighborhoods.  
 
In Europe, that would be Russia. Along with other things, sojourn spots in St. Tropez and Lake Como have changed hands from chic Parisiennes and bella Milanesas to Moscovite millionaire matriarchs. Do NOT get me started on the barely-afloat Greek islands.
 
But is it all that middle class does? Heck, no. The income rise couldn’t have come from them just lounging idly around on La-Z-Boy chairs. The rise comes from their hard work, which contributes to national output, just as the taxes collected from their income contribute to the country’s revenue. In demanding goods and services, their value-for-money principle and willingness to pay more for higher quality call for efficient manufacturing and effective public sector. Their yearning for better living induces them to adapt to technologies, leading to industrial technology transfers. Along with consumption, their investment (read: risk) appetite is also growing, beyond financial sector and into real sector. What is an entrepreneur, really, but someone who assumes risks in investing for future growth, all the while providing real jobs for working class? How, then, all of these were labeled in such a slapdash manner to “parasite existence”, I fail to fathom.      
 
Do not confuse their gusto for personal vehicles and traffic complaints with government’s longstanding inability to provide sufficient and integrated transportation systems, urban and rural. Do not sneer at their preference for malls and overseas concerts without recogizing government’s failure in public place developments and maintenance. Criticize urban planning and policies that enable proliferation of shopping centers at the cost of green parks, while acknowledging as well that entrepreneurs run businesses and people get jobs there. And before you accuse fledgling factory owners as modern-day Count Dracula preying at workers, open your eyes to the fact that crumbling infrastructure, loopholes in regulations, weak law enforcement and rampant corruption have collectively suck out the ever-thinning cushion owners can keep in maintaining competitiveness, domestic or global. If the profit becomes too marginal, it will be very tempting for owners to simply close factories and move investment to financial sectors, increasing unemployment.
 
If you want to shake up the slackers, as some of the middle class admittedly are, you need to smartly balance between luring and penalizing them. Go after their taxes, by providing public facilities. Lure them to poll booths, by jailing corrupt officials and creating a channel in which voters can make politicians execute their campaign promises. Acknowledge the involved ones, who so far have roamed the social media and started grass-root movements, so that they know they’ve made a difference and will coax their respective network to get involved, a positive snowball effect. Make it fun to be involved in thinking about the bigger issues, instead of telling them they can’t fit in because they’re a bunch of opportunistic consumers. Treat them like teenagers who have just acquired shiny, new toys—the more you alienate them, the less incentive for them to turn away from those playthings, and the less better off the nation is. Remember, they are HAVING toys to focus on. Then, soon before we know it, we all fall victim to the middle class trap like our dear neighbor Malaysia– learn about it earnestly, then think thrice about meddling too much on middle class’ natural dynamics.
 
The worst of all, really, is to become some middle class member, who earns living from yet fellow middle class, yet to subjectively point fingers at middle class’ flaws without providing workable solutions. Professional proletarian snobs? Pffft.
 
Now while you digest this, I’ll head for yoga, the world in which everyone is about equal, unless your seven chakras are all opened for which you’ll be the new divinity after Buddha anyway. I promise I’ll chant an earthly mantra for the ivory towers and a loving prayer for my middle class brethren.

As published: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/02/26/when-ivory-tower-meddles-middle-class.html                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Posted in Econ, Politics, Society | Leave a comment